{
  "thesis": "Design systems are not just UI kits. They are cultural surfaces where governance, taste, and institutional ambition become visible.",
  "stats": [
    [
      "Specimens",
      "163"
    ],
    [
      "Public source",
      "115"
    ],
    [
      "Voice layers",
      "70"
    ],
    [
      "Design kits",
      "75"
    ]
  ],
  "sections": [
    [
      "What the content is doing",
      "A field report about how organizations publish components, language, kits, and code \u2014 and what that reveals about them."
    ],
    [
      "What changes across styles",
      "Not the facts. The reading posture changes: manifesto, portal, critique wall, field notes, or catalog."
    ],
    [
      "What to look for",
      "Typography, density, color behavior, composition, and whether the page feels institutional, underground, speculative, or handmade."
    ]
  ],
  "styles": [
    [
      "swiss",
      "Swiss",
      "Order, signal color, typographic governance.",
      "Turns the content into a rigorous field report: neutral, structured, and high-trust."
    ],
    [
      "y2k-cyber-future",
      "Y2K Cyber Future",
      "Chrome portals, synthetic glow, techno-luxury optimism.",
      "Treats the same content like a speculative interface from a near-future network archive."
    ],
    [
      "art-school-poster",
      "Art School Poster",
      "Crit wall tension, oversized type, sharp collisions.",
      "Feels like a thesis statement pinned up in a studio: ideas first, neatness second."
    ],
    [
      "zine-xerox-bulletin",
      "Zine / Xerox Bulletin",
      "Photocopy energy, annotations, field-research voice.",
      "Makes the material feel discovered, argued over, and passed hand to hand."
    ],
    [
      "whole-earth-catalog",
      "Whole Earth Catalog",
      "Dense recommendation engine, warm systems thinking.",
      "Recasts the page as a practical guide assembled by a curious, opinionated human."
    ]
  ]
}